After the old forum software breaking in a way that we were unable to fix, we've migrated the site to a new platform.
Some elements aren't working as we'd hoped - some avatars didn't survive the transition, and we're still having issues with attachments that weren't added as inline images, but we're hoping to have that all sorted out soon.
Hello all,
Its been a while for me to post and visit this forum, its good to see that it has grown and has welcomed some new members.
My latest post is in regards to milk. I have read back through some of the recent topics and came across a topic "Mocha Double Decaf Latte".
It discussed the use of or not use of soy milk by a certain Perth cafe, as he didnt believe it was in his best interests to do so.
I believe his main reason for doing this was that it was not worth the effort to keep soy on hand for every 'n'th coffee that he would make. This has its merits as it would be costly to keep a stock of soy that would only be useful for one coffee, as after it is opened it may go bad before the entire carton is used.
There was another good comment that by using soy, you would be able to have access to the 10 other mothers in that group who would only drink there if their freind could have soy, and hence cover any loss that the one soy coffee would bring.
What the point of this post is, is to acertain who out there carries more than two types of milk, ie milk and soy. Some cafes' i have seen carry, full cream, hilo/(Brownes makes a lable called 'capo' in western australia for cappucinos'), skim milk, full cream soy, skim soy.
Although it may win you 'some' sales, this practice i believe could become costly in most smaller establishments, unless that is your strategy, to differentiate your product line by offering as much as possible.
What are peoples thoughts and opinions on this.
regards
Domenic
Comments