frame
After the old forum software breaking in a way that we were unable to fix, we've migrated the site to a new platform.

Some elements aren't working as we'd hoped - some avatars didn't survive the transition, and we're still having issues with attachments that weren't added as inline images, but we're hoping to have that all sorted out soon.

Terminology.

edited January 1970 in Have your say
Time and again we see people on forums referring to ground coffee as coffee grounds, not to be pedantic but as far as I am, and most of the English speaking world is concerned the correct term is grounds.
The term coffee grinds offends my sensitive old ears. ;D

Comments

  • We need to ask Profesor Rollie Sussex for the definition on that  :question: Not sure if I have done any word replacement in the past, so I will be mindful of it in the future It could also be a local or country of origin thing KK
  • It's definitely grounds and yes, you are being pedantic. Perhaps the holiday wasn't long enough.  ;) The question that needs to be asked is are there grounds <ahem> for confusion? If someone refers to 'coffee grinds' rather than 'coffee grounds', could you mistake their meaning? Probably a bit like the expresso vs espresso argument, (and expresso is considered a valid alternative spelling).
  • http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_difference_between_coffee_grinds_and_grounds I suspect the answer lies somewhere in between, ground coffee before brewing is, well, ground coffee, not grinded ;) and after brewing the stuff we add to our compost is coffee grounds. ;D
  • AFAIK, it would be acceptable to write that a person who cares about their coffee, grinds fresh each time. So while "coffee grinds" might be incorrect, "coffee, grinds" is acceptable usage. Or did I get that wrong? ;D
  • on 1340749858:
    "you are being pedantic." Good, for the purpose of promoting a discussion I meant to be. ;) "Perhaps the holiday wasn't long enough.  ;)" I'm a retired gentleman of leisure, life is one long holiday. ;D (and expresso is considered a valid alternative spelling). Is it! ;)
  • on 1340749858:
    It's definitely grounds and yes, you are being pedantic. Perhaps the holiday wasn't long enough.  ;) The question that needs to be asked is are there grounds <ahem> for confusion? If someone refers to 'coffee grinds' rather than 'coffee grounds', could you mistake their meaning? Probably a bit like the expresso vs espresso argument, (and expresso is considered a valid alternative spelling).
    Expresso just sounds wrong! I don't care what Wikipedia says!  :)
  • on 1340756041:
    Expresso just sounds wrong! I don't care what Wikipedia says!  :)
    I agree, very boganish. :laugh:
Sign In or Register to comment.

Coffee Forum

@ 2026 The Coffee Forum, All rights reserved.

Policies

Social